Given the option, I would take the slightly overweight best friend, and I wouldn't consider it settling.
As much as I hate to admit it, I am indoctrinated into a culture of "take the best you can get." That is to say, girls like me (tall but not tall enough to be models, slightly overweight, with bad skin and slightly androgynous facial features) don't get boys that look like Brad Pitt (or other ridiculously good looking celebrity. Let's pretend we're talking about the Brad Pitt who does not have a tentacle monster growing off his face.) When it seems like a guy who is "better than you can do" is interested in you, well, you don't believe it. And then you act stupid and you miss the opportunity and the fact that I talk like this is why I don't have any friends.
So there is sort of this societal view, or at least according to the folks who are surreptitiously scripting "My Life as Liz," that a funky Juno knockoff (minus teen pregnancy) like Liz deserves to be with a cute, bland boy instead of the smart, funny guy who incidentally has a double chin and is so obviously head over heels for her.
I would take him.
Metaphorgotten in this post, apparently. Maybe I should stop blogging at 11:30 at night.
I have a few strict standards, which is why I guess I tend to not have any luck with the opposite sex.
ReplyDelete1: A girl must be intelligent enough that I can carry on a conversation with her. (Two girls at college who had crushes on me and followed me around like lost puppies did not qualify)
2: She must not be insane to the point of self-harm. (Two girls at college who I tried to date... I ended it when I found out they cut themselves)
3: ...actually, there really isn't a #3. Intelligent, and doesn't cut self kind of is it.